Richard III

By -
Richard III, by William Shakespeare

Richard III, as everyone already knows, is Shakespeare's most villainous villain, embracing evil and having people murdered left and right until he comes to a well-deserved end in battle.  And as a cartoon villain he's pretty great; he thinks of everything and tirelessly makes everything terrible for everyone around him, even his poor old mother.  He even tries to marry the older sister of the princes he had killed!

Evil Richard III
I really liked the prominent roles that the women played towards the end.  Possibly because there were no men left, having all been murdered by that time, but the ladies have these wonderful scenes where they lament their losses and blame Richard III for everything--just as he deserves.

I did find this play quite difficult to read, just because there are all these characters, all with titles that make it tricky to keep track of them, and anyway which Edward or Richard or Elizabeth are we talking about again?  I would very much like to watch a performance--I should have looked at the DVDs when I was at the library yesterday.

Only averagely awful Richard III
Having read The Daughter of Time and followed the surprise excavation of Richard's body last year, I'm pretty familiar with the historical background and reasons why Shakespeare made his character so mustache-twirlingly rotten.  Richmond, the glorious hero of the play and savior of all England, became King Henry VII, founder of the Tudor dynasty and Queen Elizabeth's very own grandpa.  He was in fact an awful person, but then so was pretty much everyone else who clawed their way to a contested throne.  You don't get that kind of job without being pretty horrible.  I'm sure the real-life Richard III was awful too, even though he didn't really go around scheming in iambic pentameter.  

And my answer to The Question is, yeah, I totally think he had the princes bumped off, Josephine Tey's defense notwithstanding.


Comments

  1. SophiaJanuary 29, 2014 at 5:39 PM

    I haven't read Richard III but have read other books dealing with him... I suppose I should read it sometime, but I haven't had much free time in January to indulge in the Shakespeare theme as much as I would have liked.

    Oh, and I agree with you wholeheartedly on The Question! :-)

    ReplyDelete
  2. SophiaJanuary 29, 2014 at 5:39 PM

    I haven't read Richard III but have read other books dealing with him... I suppose I should read it sometime, but I haven't had much free time in January to indulge in the Shakespeare theme as much as I would have liked.

    Oh, and I agree with you wholeheartedly on The Question! :-)

    ReplyDelete
  3. Nancy LeekJanuary 29, 2014 at 6:57 PM

    The library has a BBC production of Richard III which I thoroughly enjoyed. Much better than just reading it.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Amateur Reader (Tom)January 30, 2014 at 6:21 AM

    As for movies, this play presents an opportunity. Have you seen Al Pacino's documentary "Looking for Richard"? I would actually go to that before any other adaptation. I wish Pacino had made one of those for every Elizabethan play.

    ReplyDelete
  5. JeanJanuary 30, 2014 at 7:40 AM

    OK, I'll get that library movie and look for the Pacino documentary. I've never heard of that at all--thanks Tom.

    ReplyDelete
  6. AnonymousJanuary 30, 2014 at 7:20 PM

    I don't think he had the kids bumped off BUT I do think his means of keeping little Edward off the throne were on the shady side. I am okay with it though because I think having a little kid as the king would have been a hot mess for England, and I can see how Richard III could reasonably feel he would do a better job at being the king than a bunch of Woodville relations.

    ...I may or may not own a framed print of that portrait of Richard III. WHO CAN SAY.

    ReplyDelete
  7. JeanJanuary 30, 2014 at 10:15 PM

    Jenny, you crack me up! I totally believe that you have a framed Richard III around the house. Your theory is also possible, I admit.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

I'd love to know what you think, so please comment!

Popular posts from this blog

Faerie Queen Readalong I: Redcrosse, the Knight of Holiness

By -
Image
I did it, I read all of Book I!  My minimum requirement was two cantos a day, but I managed three a couple of times.  I'm hoping to read ahead, because I'll be gone for two weeks in the middle of this event and I'd like to be able to prep a post ahead of time...but the schedule is already pretty demanding.  The reading is not terribly difficult, but it is slow.  I keep thinking that I've read a large chunk, only to look back and realize that in fact I have read six verses.  So here we go with analysis... Each book in the Faerie Queene features a knight, and a story, about a particular virtue.  The Redcrosse Knight, to be known as St. George after he accomplishes his feats, is all about Holinesse .  This does not mean that Redcrosse already exemplifies holiness; he doesn't.  Holiness is what he's working towards and struggling with.  His foes symbolize various forms of unholiness, and he falls into their clutches at least as often as he ...
Read more

The Four Ages of Poetry

By -
Image
  "The Four Ages of Poetry," by Thomas Love Peacock I am becoming fond of Thomas Love Peacock.  Besides his unbeatable name, he was a lot of fun.  Peacock was a minor literary figure of the early 19th century; he tried his hand at poetry but mainly succeeded in satire.  I read his short novel Nightmare Abbey last year, but at the time I didn't know that the young hero of the story, Scythrop, was modeled on Peacock's good friend Percy Shelley.  He and Shelley were quite close and Peacock was the executor of Shelley's will. Thomas Love Peacock Percy Bysshe Shelley "The Four Ages of Poetry," a tongue-in-cheek essay on the history and development of poetry, was published in 1820 in a new magazine called Literary Miscellany , which promptly died.  It would probably have been completely obscure and unknown--it nearly is anyway--but for Shelley.  Peacock sent a copy to his friend, who I guess didn't really have much of a sense of...
Read more

A few short stories in Urdu

By -
Image
 Back in August, I got hold of a book of Urdu short stories translated into English.  It's a large book, so I wanted to read just the women authors for WIT, and that would still be a good amount.  August got away from me, and I only read one or two stories back then, but I've continued reading them since.  I've now finished all the short stories in the book that were written by women (luckily for me, there are short biographies in an appendix, since I could only tell from the name about half the time).  I'll just highlight a couple: "The Wagon," by Khalida Asghar, is a hallucinatory, apocalyptic story.  The narrator meets three strange men who are watching the evening sky and point out that it has become red.  No one had noticed until they said so, but the sky is now strangely red.  Then a smell arrives, so offensive and sickening that it causes real pain -- but only once it's pointed out.  And finally, a mysterious wagon, which may be the s...
Read more