The Literary Movements Reading Challenge
Fanda at Classiclit has got a lovely new challenge for next year--the Literary Movement Reading Challenge. It's pretty ambitious. Take a look at what she says (I'm giving the first part but there's lots more at the post):
1. Reading (or rereading) at least one book each month according to the literary movements we are covering; here is the list:
The aim is to study how our literary world has been evolving from Medieval era up to the present. There are so many lists/timelines out there, but I particularly use this literary periods timeline from online-literature dot com; firstly, it is simple and nicely presented, and secondly because the number of the movements fits more or less with the challenge purpose. If you see the info-graphic, there are thirteen movements. I will dedicate each month for each movement; but as the Beat Generation period is mostly overlapping the Bloomsbury's, I will merge them into one month.
1. Reading (or rereading) at least one book each month according to the literary movements we are covering; here is the list:
- January: Medieval
- February: Renaissance
- March: Enlightenment
- April: Romanticism
- May: Transcendentalism
- June: Victorian
- July: Realism
- August: Naturalism
- September: Existentialism
- October: Modernism
- November: Beat Generation or Bloomsbury Group
- December: Post-Modernism
I have no idea what books I will pick. I have a small pile of non-Arthurian medieval books to choose from for January! Oh, I'm sure I can find lots. Some of these might be tricky--existentialism, even transcendentalism because I'm not a big Thoreau fan--but I think this will be great. Thanks Fanda!
Can I just - no, I should keep my mouth shut. It's the confusion between periods and movements. I am grinding my teeth. The source timeline is not at fault.
ReplyDelete"Medieval" - a period - covers a thousand years of literature from around the world. "Transcendentalism" - a movement - in practice covers maybe five writers. How do you like Whitman - just count him.
Anyone who attempts to make Bloomsbury and the Beats overlap will have a curious and confusing experience, although the results of reading Keynes alongside Burroughs may be instructive.
All right, I didn't keep my mouth shut. It's all good - anything to get readers to pay more attention to literary history, right?
Thanks for joining, Jean.
ReplyDeleteNow I'm curious to see what you'd be reading. Good luck! ;)
Fanda, I will come up with something closer to the end of the year. Too much trying to finish up 2014 challenges right now!:)
ReplyDeleteTom, yeah, but that's OK. Roll with it. :)
ReplyDelete